Bandicam http://abload.de/img/bandicamziswj.png
Afterburner http://abload.de/img/afterburnery7sxa.png
At the same bitrate Bandicam has much worse video quality using Quicksync. Because Bandicam devs doesn't care how can I get back my money?
The difference is huge for a good eye. Much better detail preservation in Afterburner.I just don't understand what you want... the pictures seem to be nearly exactly the same.
Game or video recording. It's basically better than NVENC regarding quality, but Bandicam prefers to pick the worst TU7 and Main profile instead TU4 High Profile. In Playclaw and Afterburner there is a quality slider. Maybe it's a political decision from Bandicam to downgrade Quicksync.What do you want with quicksync?
TU means target usage of Quicksync. Intel and me recommend TU4/balanced. TU1 means best, TU7 worst. For video recording there is no performance difference between the different target usage presets, even TU1 is fast enough.What the hell is TU7?
For video or game recording. Bandicam made false promises last year unfortunately. They know it.Did you really bought BDcam for taking screenshots?
Return to “Bandicam - General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 105 guests